11. तक यदि लेवीय याजक पद के द्वारा सिद्धि हो सकती है (जिस के सहारे से लोगों को व्यवस्था मिली थी) तो फिर क्या आवश्यकता थी, कि दूसरा याजक मलिकिसिदक की रीति पर खड़ा हो, और हारून की रीति का न कहलाए?
भजन संहिता 110:4
11. Therefore, if it had been possible to reach the goal through the system of [cohanim] derived from Levi (since in connection with it, the people were given the [Torah]), what need would there have been for another, different kind of [cohen], the one spoken of as to be compared with Malki-Tzedek and not to be compared with Aharon?